That movie was buried inside the move that I got, to be sure. The titular tomboy faintly eschews traditionally feminine pursuits and pursues her job as a mechanic with gusto. Her hero, a race car driver, just happens to be employed by (and friends with?) the local rich guy whose fancy car she's been working on. This launches her on an on again, off again romance with said driver which culminates in a head to head race with everything on the line.
Scene after scene is wholly devoted to investing in the friend, and the friend's story is a full on 80s sex comedy. She has raunchy dance numbers, fully-nude locker room run-ins with mustachioed gay men, wild, "Bachelor Party"-style party scenes and so many other comical, largely naked misadventures. She doesn't just have the sexy B story to the tomboy's A story: it's more like A1 and A2. Naturally, neither story gets a ton of oxygen. The tomboy especially suffers. Her story actually needs investment and payoff. The friend's story is secondary to the opportunities it presents for her and those around her to get naked.
Like I said, I enjoyed the movie fairly well, but I would have done a lot different. I might have recast the race car driver, who's handsome but boring. The tomboy, the friend and the conniving rich guy are fine (though the latter is too young). The main thing is deciding which movie you're making. Either the tomboy or the friend could be the lead, but they can't both be. Either movie is valid. The tomboy's story is more substantial, but the friend's story probably was more commercial at the time. You've got to pick one, or make two movies. I guess that's what I would have liked to have done.
No comments:
Post a Comment
What say you, netizen?